Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation

The authors develop a model that clarifies the respective advantages and disadvantages of academic and private-sector research. Results indicate that by serving as a precommitment mechanism that allows scientists to freely pursue their own interests, academia can be indispensable for early-stage research. At the same time, the private sector’s ability to direct scientists towards higher-payoff activities makes it more attractive for later-stage research.

Universities Continue to Expand Their Research Space with the Largest Increase Since 1988; Data Reported for Networking Capacity

According to the National Science Foundations biennial survey of Science and Engineering Research Facilities, research-performing colleges and universities reported an 11 percent increase in the amount of research space from FY 2001 to FY 2003, for a total of approximately 173 million net assignable square feet.

University Funding Systems and their Impact on Research and Teaching: A General Framework

This paper addresses the following question: how does a higher education funding system influence the trade-off that universities make between research and teaching? The authors construct a general model that allows universities to choose actively the quality of their teaching and research when faced with different funding systems.

Pro-cyclical R&D Puzzle: Technology Shocks and Pro-cyclical R&D Expenditure

The paper examines the cyclical property of R&D expenditure in the context of endogenous growth, and concludes that substitutability between investing in physical capital and investing in technology/knowledge is a key of the cyclical property of R&D; basically technology shocks accompany counter-cyclical R&D and demand shocks accompany pro-cyclical R&D; and the easiest way to solve the pro-cyclical R&D puzzle is to abandon the conjecture that business cycles are generated mainly by technology shocks.