state budget

Earlier in the month, Maryland Gov. Lawrence Hogan announced the 2017 Maryland Jobs Initiative, a legislative package that would eliminate all state taxes for 10 years for new manufacturing employers that create jobs in high unemployment areas, as well as incentives for current employers who expand their workforce in those areas. The package also includes $1 million for a program for employers to invest in employee training to keep their skills up to date, $3 million in funding for cyber job training grants, and expansion of an existing program that would make tax credits accessible to investors in cybersecurity startups. Released earlier this week, the governor’s budget recommends funding levels for a variety of tech-based economic development programs, initiatives and tax credits.

Much of the media coverage on the latest NASBO Fiscal Survey of States, suggests the Great Recession is finally behind the states as aggregate general revenue funds finally surpassed fiscal 2008 levels. But unlike the federal government, there are 50 individual state budgets and they tell very different stories, influenced by the economics, demographics, tax structures and politics of the particular state. For instance, while the aggregated stats sound rosy, a majority of states, 29, still reported 2016 general fund expenditures below the 2008 levels before the Great Recession really hit state revenues.  SSTI’s monitoring of state fiscal conditions reveals recent monthly revenues for a growing number of states – in months after the NASBO spring survey was conducted – are not meeting intake expectations. This might suggest FY 2017 revenue and spending forecasts may slow even more than NASBO’s reported 2.9 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively.

Ten Connecticut startups competed in a $10,000 pitch competition at CTNext last week, but the five-year-old state initiative finds itself the winner of a much higher-stakes appraisal. Gov. Dannel Malloy approved the FY 2017 state budget bill on June 2, which will make CTNext an independent organization with $67 million in bonding support. Among the powers assigned to the organization are managing an innovation-places program and maintaining a crowdfunding website, in addition to a broad array of activities geared toward promoting tech-based economic development in Connecticut.

Maryland legislators recently approved a $42.3 billion fiscal year 2017 spending bill that incorporates many of the funding levels included in Gov. Larry Hogan’s proposal. Gov. Hogan made education a main focus of his proposal, and the final bill would hold university tuition increases to no more than 2 percent. In addition, legislators formalized the growing strategic partnership between University of Maryland campuses in Baltimore and College Park. The unification is intended to bolster the state’s research profile, and drive high-tech industries in the Baltimore region.

Many states across the country already have, or will soon have, signed budgets ready for the 2017 fiscal year.  Over the past few months, SSTI has examined gubernatorial addresses and proposed budgets for a preview of technology-based economic development spending in the coming year. This week, we take a look at what initiatives and spending levels survived spending negotiations in New York, South Dakota, Wyoming.

Many states across the country already have, or will soon have, signed budgets ready for the 2017 fiscal year.  Over the past few months, SSTI has examined gubernatorial addresses and proposed budgets for a preview of technology-based economic development spending in the coming year. This week, we take a look at what initiatives and spending levels survived spending negotiations in Alabama, Florida, Idaho and New Mexico, as well as an update on the budget situation in Pennsylvania.

Governors around the country continue to lay out priorities for the next legislative session. In the coming weeks, SSTI will review gubernatorial addresses and budget proposals related to economic development. This week, we highlight developments in Illinois, Michigan and New Jersey.

SSTI’s analysis of gubernatorial addresses, strategic plans and budget proposals continues this week with highlights from Alabama, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Tennessee. Governors are facing difficult fiscal situations in several of these states, often scaling back tech-based economic development efforts. Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam, however, is using a fiscal surplus to invest in higher education and regionally focused economic initiatives.

Last week, Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo proposed more than $51 million in investments focused on reinvigorating the state’s economy through innovative industries with the release of her fiscal year 2017 budget request. The governor’s Make It in RI jobs plan incorporates many of the recommendations from a strategic plan developed by the Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings, Battelle Technology Partnership Practice (now TEConomy Partners, LLC) and Monitor Deloitte. One of the key investments is a $20 million brick-and-mortar innovation district where entrepreneurs, businesspeople and academics can interact.

Although universities are often pitted against each other in athletic events or competitions for state funding, one area in which they have increasingly been able to collaborate is in research and development. Modeled after the hugely successful Research Triangle in North Carolina, the University Research Corridor (URC), an alliance of Michigan’s three largest higher education institutions – Michigan State University, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State University – was established by the state in 2007 with the goal of accelerating statewide economic development. Employing several facets of analysis not typically seen in higher-ed economic impact reports, the URC’s ninth annual assessment by independent evaluator Anderson Consulting Group is able to: quantify total degrees awarded, R&D expenditures, and technology transfer activities to estimate the cumulative impact of the corridor; analyze how the URC leads to jobs and income for residents and state revenue in each of Michigan’s counties; and, compare the URC’s performance to peer university innovation clusters nationwide. They find that the URC generated approximately $17.5 billion in net economic impact in 2014.