• As the most comprehensive resource available for those involved in technology-based economic development, SSTI offers the services that are needed to help build tech-based economies.  Learn more about membership...

SSTI Digest

Useful Stats: Higher Education R&D by State and Institution

The United States is home to some of the world's most prestigious universities, each performing critical research that helps advance the country’s innovation economy. However, these universities are not evenly distributed across the country; many are concentrated within large cities in states where their spillover further impacts the local economies. This edition of Useful Stats explores Higher Education Research and Development (HERD) Survey data from the newest fiscal year (FY) 2022 data release. Specifically, a state and institution-level look at HERD expenditures over the last decade of available data will be conducted to explore any trends.   State-level trends in HERD Research and development (R&D) expenditures neared $100 billion across the U.S. in FY 2022, a 9% increase from FY 2021’s $89.8 billion and a 46% increase from FY 2013’s $67.1 billion. Twenty-seven states had higher education R&D expenditures totaling over $1 billion in FY 2022, while an additional nine states and Washington, D.C. had less than a billion but more than half a million. The remaining 14 states and Puerto Rico had between $100-500 million in HERD…

NSF announces Accelerating Research Translation awards

The National Science Foundation recently announced awarding more than $100 million to 18 teams at academic institutions across the nation through the Accelerating Research Translation (ART) program. An NSF press release states, “NSF's investment will enable academic institutions to accelerate the pace and scale of translational research that will grow the nation's economy.” Each ART awardee will receive up to $6 million over four years to identify and build upon academic research with the potential for technology transfer and societal and economic impacts, to ensure the availability of staff with technology transfer expertise, and to support the education and training of entrepreneurial faculty and students. Each ART awardee institution partners with a mentoring institution of higher education with a robust ecosystem for translational research. At least 15 universities are among the partner mentoring institutions that are part of the ART network formed by this cohort of awardees. The complete award list can be found here. NSF estimates that there will be up to 10 awards per round of this solicitation. The next deadline date is September 18, 2024. Thereafter, the…

U.S. House Select Committee releases report on U.S.-China competition

A bipartisan report from the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party says the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has failed to live up to the foundational principles of the World Trade Organization—open, market-oriented, non-discriminatory treatment. In its report, "Reset, Prevent, Build: A Strategy to Win America's Economic Competition with the Chinese Communist Party," the committee calls for resetting the U.S.'s economic relationship with China. They propose to do so, in part, through new research security measures and controls on technology exports. The report is organized under three pillars: Reset the terms of our economic relationship with the PRC. Stem the flow of U.S. capital and technology fueling the PRC's military modernization and human rights abuses, and Invest in technological leadership and build collective economic resilience in concert with allies. The report authors note that the first two pillars focus on defensive actions against the CCP’s economic warfare campaign.But the final pillar goes on the offensive, calling for the U.S. to invest in technological leadership and build economic resilience. Reset our economic…

DOE Launches New Office to Coordinate Critical and Emerging Technology

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently announced the Office of Critical and Emerging Technology launch. A DOE press release explains that the office has been created “to ensure U.S. investments in areas such as artificial intelligence (AI), biotechnology, quantum computing, and semiconductors leverage the department’s wide range of assets and expertise to accelerate progress in these critical sectors.” Critical and emerging technologies, such as clean energy, national defense, and pandemic preparedness, have broad applications throughout DOE. According to the press release, “(m)ajor advances in critical and emerging technologies hold extraordinary potential for the economy and national security but also pose significant risks, and DOE’s new office will focus the department’s efforts ensuring that its capabilities are helping to solve critical science, energy, and security challenges.” Helena Fu, who was senior advisor to the undersecretary for science and innovation after serving as director for technology and national security at the National Security Council, was named director of the new office. Fu will also serve as DOE’s chief artificial intelligence…

The defense bill contains fewer provisions related to research, technology, and entrepreneurship than initially proposed

The National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2024, signed in late December, ultimately contained fewer provisions related to research, technology, and entrepreneurship than the draft versions of the legislation initially proposed. Nonetheless, the final bill made some changes that could stabilize some of the department’s innovation activities in recent years and add some flexibility for companies and organizations engaging in technology transfer activities with defense institutions. Specifically, four sections worth noting in the FY 2024 NDAA are the following: Codification of the Office of Strategic Capital, which was launched in 2022, and a loan program to support emerging technology needs. Formalization of the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), which includes making the director a principal staff assistant to the Secretary of Defense, allowing DIU to use federal “other transaction authority” (OTA) agreements, and requiring DIU to provide support to multi-stakeholder research and commercialization partnerships. Requirement that each military department designate a principal technology transition advisor to advise on technology transfer and acquisition opportunities.…

NY announces $1B for semiconductor R&D center; U.S. Department of Commerce awards $35M as first step in implementation phase of CHIPS and Science

Activity to build the U.S. semiconductor industry picked up steam on Monday, December 11. On that day, New York State, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced the state was committing $1 billion to what her office described as “a $10 billion partnership with leaders from the semiconductor industry such as IBM, Micron, Applied Materials, Tokyo Electron, and others to establish a next-generation semiconductor research and development center at NY CREATES’ Albany NanoTech Complex.” Also on that day, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the U.S. Department of Commerce and BAE Systems Electronic Systems, a business unit of BAE Systems, Inc., have signed a non-binding preliminary memorandum of terms (PMT) to provide approximately $35 million in federal incentives under the CHIPS and Science Act to support the modernization of the company’s Microelectronics Center in Nashua, New Hampshire. The newly announced partnership in New York State will, according to a statement from the governor’s office, “fund the construction of a cutting-edge High NA Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Center … that will support the research and development of the world’s most complex and powerful…

Useful Stats: HERD expenditures by R&D field and source of funds

Research and Development (R&D) is an essential component of innovation and economic growth, where higher education institutions play a key role. However, with these institutions being responsible for funding just a quarter of all HERD expenditures, it is important to see the influence of outside funding sources on the fields of R&D. For example, Health and Human Services (HHS) has long been the largest contributor of funding into higher education R&D, which is reflected in life sciences being the R&D field with the most significant funding levels. This edition of Useful Stats uses higher education research and development (HERD) survey data at the R&D field level to explore where the nearly $100 billion in R&D expenditures is going.   HERD expenditures in science, engineering, and non-S&E by source of funds Science and engineering (S&E) fields have historically accounted for most higher education R&D expenditures and continue to do so with a 94% share of HERD expenditures in FY 2022. However, the proportion of science, engineering, and non-S&E fields differs depending on the source of funds; federally…

White House proposes use of march-in rights to help lower prescription drug prices

The Biden-Harris administration recently announced new actions to lower health care and prescription drug costs by promoting competition. These actions include a proposed framework that encourages agencies to use march-in rights to lower the price of prescription medicines. The proposed framework encourages agencies to consider price as a factor in determining whether a drug is genuinely accessible to the public. Prescription drugs cost more in the U.S. than elsewhere, even though taxpayers' dollars support federal research. Each year, U.S. taxpayers contribute more than $40 billion to the National Institutes of Health, according to the NIH budget webpage, while, as the White House fact sheet announcing the new actions points out, nearly three in ten individuals struggle to pay for the drugs they need. The fact sheet notes, “(w)hen an invention is made using taxpayer funds, under certain circumstances march-in authority under the Bayh-Dole Act enables the federal government to license the invention to another party.” The directive refutes a proposed rule change by the previous administration, which the Biden administration decided not to finalize earlier this…

Geo-targeting could be the answer to a greener America

Countries participating in the COP28 climate summit agreed this week to call for "transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems…”  Earlier this year, researchers at Nature Communications said a full transition from fossil fuels could displace 1.7 million fossil fuel workers in the United States and an even greater number on the global scale. In anticipation, employees, unions, and policymakers are seeking a “Just Transition” in which fossil fuel workers receive public support to find new lines of work. Researchers Junghyun Lim, Michaël Aklin and Morgan R. Frank ask whether fossil fuel workers need re-skilling to perform green jobs in America. The authors compare the skill requirements of fossil fuel occupations to the occupations in other industries using Jaccard similarity, a statistic used for gauging the similarity and diversity of sample sets. They found that fossil fuel workers do indeed have significantly more skill similarity to green industry occupations than they would to other industries, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Chart A compares the skills of fossil fuel workers and Chart B…

Report sheds light on SBIR subcontracting behavior

A new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) studies a sample of 198 Phase II Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) awards from FY 2019 to identify subcontracting activity. SBIR recipients are generally allowed to subcontract up to 50% of their award value, and STTR recipients must contract at least 30% with a nonprofit research institution. GAO found that 30% of Phase II awards included no subcontract, 24% included at least one subcontract with an academic institution, and 23% included at least one subcontract with a large business (including many defense contractors). The study also found marked differences between the Department of Defense, with 55% of Phase II awards including at least one subcontract, and civilian agencies, which saw subcontracts in 82% of awards. The purpose of GAO’s study was to determine the share of SBIR/STTR recipients reporting subcontractors in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). While the agency estimates that only 10% of awards reported subcontracts, GAO notes that compliance is low across all federal programs and…

State spending expected to rise 12.3% in FY2023 as spending rate slows, NASBO finds

A new report from NASBO (National Association of State Budget Officers), State Expenditures Report for Fiscal Years 2021-2023, finds while spending remains elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels, it is starting to slow. Spending from states’ funds rose 12.3% in FY2023 as a result of states spending surplus funds. Among the  key findings of the report: Total state spending for FYFY 2023 is projected at $2.96 trillion—an increase from $2.78 trillion in FYFY 2022—and represents a total state spending growth of 6.5% (with a median growth rate of 7.5%).   During this same period (FY 2023), federal funds declined 1.8%, with a median growth rate of 0.2%. The decline is related to states expending their Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act funding and much of the American Rescue Plan Act or ARPA funding. And although federal funding declined during this time, it remains higher than pre-pandemic levels.   In FY 2022, total state spending grew 4.6% (the median growth rate being 8%), with spending from the state’s funds at 8.8% (6.9% on a median basis). However, when looking solely at the states’ general fund spending (…

Public trust in science and scientists is declining, new survey from Pew Research Center finds

Fifty-seven percent of Americans say science has had a mostly positive effect on society, according to a recent report from the Pew Research Center. While the percentage of those with favorable views of science might seem like good news, the number is significantly less than at the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak in January 2019, when 73% of Americans declared positive views. Confidence that scientists will act for society's benefit has also declined. The Pew survey highlights differences in survey responses between Democrats and Republicans. The decline in the number of Republicans who say science has had a mostly positive effect on society is significant. The percentage of Republicans with a positive view of science’s effect on society has dropped from 70% in January 2019 to only 47% in October 2023. (All percentages for Republicans and Democrats in this article include independents who lean towards the respective parties.) In 2023, the number of Democrats who believe science has had a mostly positive effect on society still outnumbers the number of Republicans who have the same opinion: 69% of Democrats expressed this positive view of science on society in the…