SSTI Digest

Registration is now open for the SSTI 2024 Annual Conference in Phoenix, December 10-12, at the Sheraton Grand at Wild Horse Pass, located in the Gila River Indian Community.

Join us to experience thought-provoking keynotes, open forums, and ample discussion so that you can share your perspective with peers and have your questions answered by policymakers and practitioners—all looking to exchange ideas on creating a better future through science, technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship.

We can’t wait to “connect, discover, and refresh” with you in Phoenix this December!

Register today!

On Wednesday, a bipartisan group of senators published Driving U.S. Innovation in Artificial Intelligence: A Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence Policy in the United States Senate. The roadmap encourages the executive branch and the Senate Appropriations Committee to reach the $32 billion per year non-defense AI innovation spending level proposed by the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence. It also includes a list of recommendations for legislation to regulate artificial intelligence. The recommendations include prioritizing funding for a cross-government AI R&D effort at all relevant government agencies and departments. The recommendation mentions explicitly an all-of-government AI-ready data initiative. It also directs research priorities in “responsible innovation, including but not limited to fundamental and applied sciences, such as biotechnology, advanced computing, robotics, and materials science.”

Accelerators are practically everywhere in the U.S., and a look at Pitchbook data on May 13, 2024, seems to confirm that. For the five years of 2019-2023, Pitchbook tagged 18,808 different companies as having received “accelerator/incubator funding.” Conceptually, they were all startups when they received that funding and will be at widely varying degrees of evolution today (the status for 1,730 of them, for instance, was listed as “out of business”). Only 765 were classified as being one of four statuses that might be most easily considered as positive exits:  1. publicly held; 2. in IPO registration; 3. an operating subsidiary of another firm through a merger or acquisition; or 4.  integrated into another firm through a merger or acquisition and no longer tracked separately. 

Additionally, only 619 of those 765 successes are headquartered in the U.S. presently—meaning one in five are international firms with a U.S. presence.

SSTI has released a new video in our Federal Funding Video Library featuring Trent Thompson, economic development representative with the Economic Development Administration’s Denver Regional Office. In this interview, we discuss how EDA’s Economic Adjustment Assistance (EAA) funds can be leveraged to support technology-based economic development (TBED) activities. The interview provides practical advice on the application process, examples of previously funded TBED projects, and strategies for aligning these funds with your region’s needs.

While the headline above may be one of the most boring written in the SSTI Weekly Digest’s history, any recipient of federal grant funding should be aware that changes are coming to the Uniform Grants Guidance that governs federal grants, effective October 1. The guidance “sets the foundational requirements for agencies in making grants and providing other forms of Federal financial assistance, such as cooperative agreements and loans,” according to the White House. The changes will apply only to awards after October 1. Among the changes the White House is touting are directions to agencies to make grant announcements as “clear and concise as possible,” reduce unnecessary compliance costs, remove barriers to entry, and ensure assistance serves intended communities, including supporting programs for Tribal nations. Some of the specific details will be of interest to grant recipients.

Why the U.S. Economy Needs More Consolidation, Not Less, a recent paper from the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF), explains from an economics perspective the advantages of scale economy for improving an industry’s overall efficiency and productivity. Not all industries see significant economies of scale as firms grow, ITIF research points out. In fact, one in four sectors in the 938 NAICS industries do not, ITIF reports, suggesting—but not discussed, that some public policies designed to improve the performance of these small business-oriented sectors may be beneficial. Policy recommendations included in the report are intended to discourage the federal government from refining regulations governing mergers, acquisitions, and potential monopolizing effects from increased consolidation in those 710 sectors where increased consolidation yields greater efficiency and corporate receipts.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking candidates to fill a limited number of vacancies on the agency’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee, which provides advice and recommendations to the Commission on rules, regulations, and policy matters relating to small businesses.

The committee advises and consults with the Commission on rules, regulations, and policies as they relate to:

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) seeking proposals to establish and operate a CHIPS Manufacturing USA institute focused on digital twins for the semiconductor industry. The CHIPS for America Program anticipates up to approximately $285 million in funding will be awarded to the institute. Digital twins, as defined in a press release from the U.S. Department of Commerce, are “virtual models that mimic the structure, context, and behavior of a physical counterpart.”

AlphaLab Health, an accelerator program developed by Innovation Works (IW) and Allegheny Health Network (AHN) for life-sciences startups in the Pittsburgh region, has received a $10 million grant from an anonymous donor. The grant establishes the AlphaLab Health Revolving Investment Fund, which will support startups in the accelerator program. According to a press release from AlphaLab Health, the investment returns generated by the fund will create a “permanent, self-sustaining source of revenue that will be reinvested into future AlphaLab startups.” 

New House appropriations committee chair Tom Cole (R-OK) has announced a rule that nonprofits are not eligible for “community project funding” (i.e., earmarks) from the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Economic Development Initiative in the FY 2025 appropriations bill. In FY 2024, this account provided $3.3 billion to public and nonprofit organizations, and CQ Roll Call reports that nearly $800 million of the House’s projects went to nonprofits. The rules for FY 2025 also maintain the ban Cole’s predecessor, Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX), placed on all earmarks in the Labor-Health and Human Services-Education funding bill. At this point, the Senate does not seem likely to conform with the House’s change—the Senate has not published a change to its guidance and did not follow the House’s restrictions in FY 2024.

While the growth of female-founded and co-founded companies has increased at a faster rate than those of male-founded and co-founded and mixed gender founded companies, it is still a smaller amount than the other two. Additionally, these companies are more likely to receive a higher proportion of deals occurring earlier in the VC pipeline.

Since 2014, companies founded or co-founded by a female have increased by the largest amount of any gender combination. Sixty percent of these founders have received a venture capital (VC) deal, according to SSTI analysis of PitchBook data. Across both male- and female-founded or co-founded companies, this figure drops to a relatively lower 29%, while those founded or co-founded by a male have increased 24% over the same period.

In the 21st century, some high-tech firms in emerging fields are valued more for their perceived innovation potential than by traditional measures of a successful business. But how does innovation influence the value of existing publicly traded firms? New research by Panteleimon Kruglov and Charles Shaw explores the relationship between R&D intensity and financial performance among S&P 500 companies over 100 quarters from 1998 to 2023 and its implications for firm competitiveness and market positioning.

The research employs various econometric models to estimate the relationships between R&D intensity and key financial and operational variables. These variables include total assets, EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), physical assets, size, recession indicators, tax rate, dividend yield, and the Graham Number (a measure of fundamental value of a stock).