For three decades, the SSTI Digest has been the source for news, insights, and analysis about technology-based economic development. We bring together stories on federal and state policy, funding opportunities, program models, and research that matter to people working to strengthen regional innovation economies.

The Digest is written for practitioners who are building partnerships, shaping programs, and making policy decisions in their regions. We focus on what’s practical, what’s emerging, and what you can learn from others doing similar work across the country.

This archive makes it easy to explore years of Digest issues, allowing you to track the field’s evolution, revisit key stories, and discover ideas worth revisiting. To stay current, subscribe to the SSTI Digest and get each edition delivered straight to your inbox.

Also consider becoming an SSTI member to help ensure the publication and library of past articles may remain available to the field. 


Private sources step up to fund telescope that rivals the defunct Arecibo telescope

The Trump administration proposes significant changes in consolidated workforce plan

Q2 investment trends continue the shift to fewer but larger deals

Recent Research: How much does place matter for scientific output?

Recent research: Tulsa Remote study shows strong economic returns

To grow their local populations and STEM workforce, communities across the country are experimenting with resident/worker attraction programs, as we have previously covered. But how effective are these programs? A recent study from the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research offers new insights by analyzing Tulsa Remote’s track record from its inception in 2018 to 2023.  

Tulsa Remote, launched in 2018 with funding from the George Kaiser Family Foundation, provides $10,000 to eligible remote workers who relocate to Tulsa and commit to stay for at least one year. According to their 2024 economic impact report, Tulsa Remote has attracted 3,475 remote workers, with 96% completing their one-year requirement and 70% continuing to live in Tulsa. The program spends roughly $15,000 per participant, including the incentive, administrative costs, and community benefits such as access to co-working spaces and other networking activities. 

Employee use and perceived impacts on their competence may be behind the slow AI adoption in the workplace

Executive Order aims to reorganize federal grantmaking

A recent executive order from the White House aims to centralize federal grantmaking. This revamping of the grantmaking process would affect how decisions are made regarding the distribution of billions of dollars in research grants and have a significant impact on research universities.  While the order notes, “nothing in this order shall be construed to discourage or prevent the use of peer review methods,” it sidelines the peer review process with the disclaimer, “provided that peer review recommendations remain advisory” to the senior appointees. These senior appointees are directed to “use their independent judgment.”  All final grant award decisions across all agencies are to be made by political appointees. 

EDA has cancelled the FY 24 Build to Scale Competition

DOE plans to offer $1B for battery and critical minerals technology advancement

Examining the geographic concentration of VC investment in AI

The dominance of artificial intelligence (AI) investments in venture capital (VC) has been a consistent storyline in the first half of 2025. PitchBook, Carta, Crunchbase, and many others have all pointed to the significant portion of investment dollars and deals flowing to AI companies. With the volume of companies, deals, and dollars involved, it is more than a spike in the usual cyclic nature of  VC investment.   As SSTI wrote in our review of Q1 venture capital investment activity, VC has been concentrating in larger deals. With market trends and mega deals in AI so well documented, we explore investment concentration from  deal size and geographic perspectives. As with prior analyses, we focus on deal sizes more relevant to TBED initiatives to help regional innovation leaders identify where they might find opportunities, face challenges, or set priorities in such a dynamic environment. Excluding the largest deals from our analysis appears to be increasing important, considering  PitchBook’s findings that just ten companies accounted for 41% of all venture dollars so far this year.  

Useful Stats: Where is US manufacturing? A county-level look at subsector-specific data

Despite a decades-long decline in its share of American jobs, manufacturing remains a foundational part of the U.S. economy as the third largest contributor to its gross domestic product (GDP). Despite the sector’s share of overall U.S. employment declining over time, manufacturing continues to anchor many local economies. In this edition of Useful Stats, SSTI unveils trends shaping the manufacturing landscape, from areas of sustained growth to places undergoing structural change, by examining employment and establishment data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) at the county level.

Recent research: Who benefits from state workforce development grants?